Click here to close this window
Close Window

About the Better Buy Project/Frequently Asked Questions

Why the Federal Acquisition Process?

On his first day in office, President Obama challenged leaders in government to "use innovative tools, methods, and systems to cooperate among themselves, across all levels of Government, and with nonprofit organizations, businesses, and individuals in the private sector." The acquisition process represents one of the most important areas of collaboration between government and the private sector.

Unfortunately, it is also among the most complex and least transparent. The Better Buy Project is an experiment dedicated to the belief that there's a lot of room for improvement in the way government buys products and services. We're testing this hypothesis by asking for your ideas on how to make acquisition process more open, transparent and collaborative.

The best part of this project is that the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) GSA would really like to adopt some of your best ideas. Promising ideas will be selected by GSA to be piloted on an upcoming acquisition, where lessons learned will be captured for future implementation. But that really depends on us, and the ideas we're able to produce.

BACK TO TOP

What Topics Are At Issue?

This project is concerned primarily with the pre-contract-award stages of the acquisition process—the activities that take place before the government "signs on the dotted line" to buy a product or service. Those areas are:

The ultimate goal is to improve how government learns about and chooses what it buys—in other words, to make government a more informed, more effective consumer.

BACK TO TOP

What Kind of Feedback Are You Looking For?

We are looking for ideas to make federal acquisition more open, transparent, and collaborative. What does that mean?

We believe that making the process more open, transparent and collaborative will make government more likely to end up with the right item at the right price.

BACK TO TOP

What Is Your Moderation Policy?

This online forum allows you the opportunity to post comments and other information that will remain publicly viewable on this website. The site therefore operates a moderation policy to ensure that comments are appropriate and not harmful to others. Comments which include any of the following may be deleted by site administrators:

Additionally, while we invite open participation and diverse viewpoints to be shared, moderators reserve the right to remove posts which do not address some aspect of the stated purpose of this forum: To collect ideas about using collaboration and social media to improve the acquisition process. We deeply value your time and input, and our desire is to remove as few posts as possible while ensuring that a focused, constructive discussion takes place.

Finally, in addition to this policy, this site allows individual users to flag ideas as being spam, duplicate, or otherwise inappropriate. When an idea is flagged a sufficient number of times, it is automatically placed into a queue for review by moderators. We reserve the right to remove any posting that receives a sufficient number of "flags" to be placed in this queue, though will not automatically do so.

BACK TO TOP

What Are The Terms Of Service And Privacy Policy?

This site is hosted using a service called UserVoice. You can read the UserVoice Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

BACK TO TOP

Close Window
Better Buy is a joint project of the National Academy of Public Administration and the American Council for Technology-Industry Advisory Council in conjunction with the General Services Administration
IMPORTANT UPDATE FROM THE BETTERBUY PROJECT TEAM!
GSA FEDSIM has begun to act on the ideas you submitted by launching two acquisitions with the new BetterBuy Pilot Wiki. The new wiki, which was originally proposed in an idea on this site, will gather and utilize input from citizens outside the traditional acquisition community to improve the acquisition process. Be sure to check back with the BetterBuy Project regularly and continue to submit ideas.
-- The BetterBuy Project Team
How can we use collaboration and social media to make the federal acquisition process more efficient and effective?

The acquisition process – the way government buys goods and services – is among the most complex and least transparent aspects of government. The Better Buy Project is asking for your best ideas on how to make it more open and collaborative! Promising ideas will be selected by GSA to be piloted on future acquisitions. We are looking primarily at the pre-contract-award stages of the process – the activities that take place before the government "signs on the dotted line" to buy a product or service:


Pre-Solicitation Phase Forum

13 votes

Create user groups in Linkedin or twitter with GSA contract Number as validity for participation

To achieve the transparency and ease in acquisitions the Contracting officers from various agencies can create there user groups on social networking sites like LinkedIn or twitter. The contracting officer can only authorize those vendors who have a valid GSA contract number to be member of these groups. This will help the small vendors to see and participate in purchases for under $25,000 and also help the Contracting officers to put simplified acquisitions upto $100,000 giving a far more outreach. Most of these acquisitions are either displayed on some small bill boards in Washington DC offices or are given to known vendors. Since GSA is now the most powerful contracting vehicle in federal acquisition it is better to bring in more transparency and ease in there acquisition process.

Please clarify - let's take GSA for example - would something like this be in addition to eBuy? I know GSA has a vendor portal called VSC already for vendors to get info or transact mass mods. How do we think something like is suggested work with what GSA has?

  1. Comments
  1. Malcolm B. Smith

    Any method created should simplify the process rather than complicate. This is a common problem that must be solved in all areas of business and living. Technology is advanced enough too, to create visual tools to illustrate through the process, much like an installation wizard for software and hardware on a PC. Access by toll free number and face-book would be very broad reaching and could provide valuable collaborations usually overlooked.

  2. Peter G. Tuttle, CPCM
    Admin

    Ravi - Thanks for the clarification. Your content adds adds value to this discussion. With the Obama Administration's ststed goal of increasing competition and transparency, this idea may take off. Anybody else in the community wish to share on this subject?

  3. Ravi Bhave

    Peter, ebuy is generally for simplified acquitions over $100,000 and not for small value bids between $10,000 and $25,000. RFQ's on Ebuy require past performance as a major criteria. Mostly any federal buyer needs to have federal related past performance for bidding on these RFQ's so new entrants in the federal business who have GSA as a contract vehicle are generally not considered favorably for these bids. Since GSA is a contract vehicle where the buyer can buy of VSC list or GSA Advantage but there are over 5000 entrants in the schedule 70 area making it virtually impossible for the contracting officer to use VSC for a fair buy. My suggestion is for smaller buys if the contracting officer can use the social media sites and post those bids it will give a fair chance for the new entrants to bid on the same. As of today these small bids are hidden. Two examples of such bids are one which I dug from the DOI website for fisheries web development contract and the second example is my communications with HSRS small business officer where she tells me such small bids are posted on bill board in Rockville MD office making it virtually impossible for people not physically staying in these states. The major idea of doing smaller projects is then these projects can be added by new entrants on there future bids as there past performances. In today world social media sites if integrated properly will give a fair share of small businesses to many people.

© 2009 UserVoice | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy