Close Window
About the Better Buy Project/Frequently Asked Questions
Why the Federal Acquisition Process?
On his first day in office, President Obama challenged leaders in government to "use innovative tools, methods, and systems to cooperate among themselves, across all levels of Government, and with nonprofit organizations, businesses, and individuals in the private sector." The acquisition process represents one of the most important areas of collaboration between government and the private sector.
Unfortunately, it is also among the most complex and least transparent. The Better Buy Project is an experiment dedicated to the belief that there's a lot of room for improvement in the way government buys products and services. We're testing this hypothesis by asking for your ideas on how to make acquisition process more open, transparent and collaborative.
The best part of this project is that the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) GSA would really like to adopt some of your best ideas. Promising ideas will be selected by GSA to be piloted on an upcoming acquisition, where lessons learned will be captured for future implementation. But that really depends on us, and the ideas we're able to produce.
BACK TO TOP
What Topics Are At Issue?
This project is concerned primarily with the pre-contract-award stages of the acquisition process—the activities that take place before the government "signs on the dotted line" to buy a product or service. Those areas are:
- Market Research and Requirements Definition Phase—Includes publicizing agency needs and requirements, and refining them based on further input and research about current capabilities.
- Pre-Solicitation Phase—Includes web-based research, discussions with other federal agencies, meetings and open discussion forums with the private sector to discuss potential solutions, and requests for information soliciting input and ideas. The requirements are also further refined at this stage in the process.
- Solicitation Phase—Includes the government notifying the private sector of the requirement through various channels such as E-Buy and FedBizOpps, holding open forums to discuss the requirement and answer questions (e.g., Industry Days), a review of the solicitation by interested companies, the written exchange between government and the private sector of questions, answers and clarifications on government requirements, and proposal submissions.
The ultimate goal is to improve how government learns about and chooses what it buys—in other words, to make government a more informed, more effective consumer.
BACK TO TOP
What Kind of Feedback Are You Looking For?
We are looking for ideas to make federal acquisition more open, transparent, and collaborative. What does that mean?
- Open—Raise awareness of upcoming needs government is trying to fulfill, in order to assemble a pool of qualified providers who can compete on specific requirements.
- Transparent—Give the public and interested parties timely data on upcoming and ongoing buying activities, with the goal of promoting fair and high-quality competitions.
- Collaborative—Find ways for the government to engage in more ‘open’ conversations with the private sector on topics such as best practices, emerging technologies and innovations, and market conditions.
We believe that making the process more open, transparent and collaborative will make government more likely to end up with the right item at the right price.
BACK TO TOP
What Is Your Moderation Policy?
This online forum allows you the opportunity to post comments and other information that will remain publicly viewable on this website. The site therefore operates a moderation policy to ensure that comments are appropriate and not harmful to others. Comments which include any of the following may be deleted by site administrators:
- Threats or incitements to violence
- Use of obscenity
- Disclosure of your or others' personally-identifiable information, such as social security number or credit card number
- Duplicative or substantially duplicative postings by the same person or entity
- Postings seeking employment or containing advertisements for a commercial product or service
- Information posted in violation of law, including libel, condoning or encouraging illegal activity, revealing classified information, or infringing on a copyright or trademark
Additionally, while we invite open participation and diverse viewpoints to be shared, moderators reserve the right to remove posts which do not address some aspect of the stated purpose of this forum: To collect ideas about using collaboration and social media to improve the acquisition process. We deeply value your time and input, and our desire is to remove as few posts as possible while ensuring that a focused, constructive discussion takes place.
Finally, in addition to this policy, this site allows individual users to flag ideas as being spam, duplicate, or otherwise inappropriate. When an idea is flagged a sufficient number of times, it is automatically placed into a queue for review by moderators. We reserve the right to remove any posting that receives a sufficient number of "flags" to be placed in this queue, though will not automatically do so.
BACK TO TOP
What Are The Terms Of Service And Privacy Policy?
This site is hosted using a service called UserVoice. You can read the UserVoice Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
BACK TO TOP
Close Window
Alex Trofimovsky
education of personal is great, just as good if not better, is designing with the end-users in mind! use usability and human factors methods.
carmen
Human resources personnel need to be trained in how to hire acquisition employees and how the grades should be. At some agencies, it is recognized that contracting 1102s can go all the way up to 14s and 15s because of the complexity of procurements. Other agencies limit grades to lower grades in the series unless someone is a supervisor. Without being able to hire extremely qualified personnel, staff can't handle complex procurements.
Armand Recontee
Well it looks like GSA got the message. They are scheduled to revamp the system. But when this was announced, it appeared that the purpose was to add more info to the system. Hopefully the will get it working correctly FIRST and only then, enhance it. So far, it is competely non-intuitive and non-user friendly. Whoever designed it certainly never had to use it.
FPA
The procurement community needs to become aware that there is a 'dysfunctional culture' which prevents small and disadvantaged businesses from receiving 'maximum practicable utilization' or MPU as prescribed by P.L. 95-507. Awareness and education might help eliminate the existing practices. You can view the examples on this link, http://www.docstoc.com/profile/FPA
Raul Espinosa, Founder
Fairness in Procurement Alliance (FPA)
Peter G. Tuttle, CPCM
Since folks appear to be interested in ACMIS, there is a recent GSA RFI on the street concerning it: Link: https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=249d707e43b231686b597faef0633a90&tab=core&cck=1&au=&ck=
Geraldine Foss
Oh wow! I attended that training too! But the instructions online at the ACMIS website are hard to follow and I agree, even with the training, the system is not user friendly. Half of our training session was spent asking "Why did you set it up that way, wouldn't it make more sense if...?" The ACMIS system really needs to be revamped.
anonymous
Peter - Thank you for the support. Typical to ACMIS management, they have not improved the system so that it is user-friendly, but instead they are offering training in how to use it. I suspect that they have purchased a lousy system that they are stuck with. Have you ever tried to log in and enter data? It is completely counter-intuitive. Anyway, two months ago, when I tried to sign up on the website for training at https://admin.acmis.gov/ the login instructions were so confusing that you couldn'... more
Peter - Thank you for the support. Typical to ACMIS management, they have not improved the system so that it is user-friendly, but instead they are offering training in how to use it. I suspect that they have purchased a lousy system that they are stuck with. Have you ever tried to log in and enter data? It is completely counter-intuitive. Anyway, two months ago, when I tried to sign up on the website for training at https://admin.acmis.gov/ the login instructions were so confusing that you couldn't figure out if you were signing up for the course or logging in! But I called, got registered and just recently attended the training. Without it, no one can find their way around this puzzling maze. The training shows you how to do it, but it's terribly difficult.
Joe
Richard K Kahn
Agreed! ACMIS is a disaster. When you call the help desk they can't even help with input and update of information. It would be great to see improvements in such an important area which is supposed to support the acquistion community.
DSnyder
I have tried to put my information into ACMIS and did it once, but could never update it. And this is the system that is supposed to track training and education and certification. It is very frustrating.
AcqProf
The ACMIS system is extremely non-friendly. It is almost impossible trying to figure out how to input information.